The Logic of Interaction in Classical Persian Political-Moral Narratives: Social Etiquette and Distance Selection

Document Type : scientific-research

Authors

1 PhD Student of Persian Language and Literature, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Professor of Persian Language and Literature, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

10.22059/jlcr.2021.327009.1702

Abstract

Persian political-ethical books are a set of policies that prescribe or implicitly shared aspects of social etiquette directly with the audience and the listener. In other words, these works are a source for a variety of customs and a model for how to regulate distance and social space among people. In this article, aspects of distancing based on the contexts and topics of social etiquette such as speech and listening, nutrition and food, covering and disguise, sitting and standing, friendship and enmity are interpreted in six important Persian moral-political works. The result shows  that all areas and topics under investigation are based on creating a distance and observing pre-established order or existing natural rules that are represented in each of the areas with specific indications/signs. In the matter of speech, the words of the upper class, such as kings and sages, regardless of the subject matter, are regarded as advice and wisdom, and listening to it is considered a legitimizing blessing. In terms of eating etiqutte, they bring examples of the elaborate dining tables of the upper class, who want to keep their distance from others as a dramatic consumption. The etiquette of covering and disguise also serves as class distinction and social distancing in a marked way. In the manners of sitting and standing, distancing is based on body management. The upper class acts with a free and relaxed body, while the lower class maintains their distance with the upper class by sitting on two knees, talking slowly, etc.  For the etiquette of friendship and enmity, which is a part of social etiquette, keeping a distance from the enemy is necessary in any case, and not observing it is the cause of loss and deterioration. According to the epistemological model of the classical world and the attached socio-aristocratic aristocracy, all the mentioned fields and subjects serve in a marked way to differentiate and create a hierarchical distance. In these works, whether prescriptive propositions or narratives, they invite the audience-listener to class discipline and assume it as a form of tradition or an aspect of rationality. Such a call would automatically tie the discipline to sources of legitimacy.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Ahmadi & Nikdar Asl (1391), "An analysis of social stratification in Golestan Saadi", History of Literature, No. 71, 5-18. (in Persian(
Ali Ahmadi, Omid (1387), " The institution of family and private sector in Saadi Golestan", Sociology, No. 13, 55-86. (in Persian(
Argyle, Michael (1393), Bodily Communication, Translated by Marjan Faraji,Tehran, Javaneh Roshd. (in Persian(
Asadi, Marayam Sadat (1389), "Family in Qabus Nameh", Bustan Adab, Vol. 2, No. 4, 31-47. (in Persian(
Corrigan, Peter (1396), The Sociology of Consumption, Translated by Said Sadruleshrafi, Tehran, Golazin. (in Persian(
Crang, Mike (1383), Cultural Geography, Translated by Mehdi Qarkhlo, Tehran, Samt. (in Persian(
Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar (1377), Dictionary, Tehran, University of Tehran.
Desap, Ali (1388), “Analysis of the dominant discourse in Simin Daneshvar's novels:Savushun, Wandering Island, and The Wandering Camel Rider”, Master's thesis, Tarbiat Modares University. (in Persian(
Esmaiili et al. (1390), "Effective cultural elements on the promotion of cultural capital in Golestan Saadi", Cultural Management, Vol.5, No. 14, 1-31. (in Persian(
Fawzi, Yahya (1383), “Social challenges of the Islamic revolution in Iran: Investigation of demographic changes after the revolution and its consequences on the legitimacy of the political system”, Sociology of Iran, vol. 5, No. 3, 62-91. (in Persian(
Ghazali, Muhammad (1361), Nasihat Al Muluk, Corrected by Jalaluddin Homai, Tehran, Babak. (in Persian(
Hadi, Asghar (1389), “Criticism of the approaches of separating manners from ethics”, Ethical Research Journal, No. 1, 9-32. (in Persian(
Hall, T.Edward (1384), The Hidden Dimension, Translated by Manoochehr Tabibiyan, Tehran, University of Tehran. (in Persian(
Jenkins, Richard (1394), Social Identity, Translated by Tooraj Yarahmadi, Tehran, Pardis Danesh. (in Persian(
Kaykavus b. Eskandar (1371), Qabus Nameh, Corrected by Gholam Hussein Yusefi, Tehran, Elmi va Farhangi. (in Persian(
Madanipour, Ali (1391), Public and Private Spaces of City, Translated by Farshad Noorian, Tehran, Information and Communication Technology Organization of Tehran Municipality. (in Persian(
Manheim, Karl (1385), Essays on The Sociology of Culture, Translated by Parviz Ejlali, Tehran, Tehran, Nay. (in Persian(
Mohaddisi, Javad (2006), Social ethics, Qom, Bostan Ketab. (in Persian(
Narmashiri, Ismail (2016), “Discourse analysis of Saadi's argument with the claimant with the approach of metaphorical cognitive ideology”, Literary Textology, Vol. 21, No. 74, 54-73. (in Persian(
Nasrullah Manshi (1371), Kalila and Damneh, Corrected and explained by Mojtaba Minavi Tehrani, Tehran, Amirkabir. (in Persian(
Nizam-ul-Molk, Hasan-bin-Ali (1388), Politics, Revised by Abbas Iqbal Ashtiani, Tehran, Asatir. (in Persian(
Paterson, Mark (1398), Consumption and Everyday Life, Translated by Jamal Muhammadi & Narges Imani Marni, Tehran, Nay. (in Persian(
Pfister, Manfred (1387), The Theory & Analysis of Drama, Translated by Mehdi Nasrzadeh, Tehran, Amirkabir. (in Persian(
Pierre Bourdieu (1390), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Translated by Hassan chawoshiyan, Tehran, Sales. (in Persian(
Pira, Fatemeh (1387), “Gender in Nizam al-Mulk's Siyasatnameh”, Women in development and politics (Women's research), Issue 6, No 3, 155-169. (in Persian(
Post et al. (1392), Etiquette: Manners for a New World, Translated by Maryam Taqdisi, Tehran, Pendar Taban. (in Persian(
Ritzer, George (1374), Contemporary sociological theory, Translated by Mohsen Salasi, Tehran, Elmi. (in Persian(
Saadi (1995), Golestan, By effort of Khalil Khatib Rahbar, Tehran, Safi Alishah. (in Persian(
Torabi Farsani & Ghandi (1394), “Books of Etiquette and Its Role in Social Historiography”, History of Islam & Iran, No 27, 67-76. (in Persian(
Zevi, Bruno (1387), How to Look at Architecture, Translated by Farideh Garman, Tehran, Shahidi. (in Persian(
Sabziyan poor, Vahid (1392), “Investigating the Pedagogical Views of Ancient Iranians in Qabus Nameh”, Vol.5,No. 17, 51-86. (in Persian(
Safarzaei & et al. (1397), “The effect of Sassanid kings' instructions on the educational opinions of the elements of Qaboos Namah”, Historical studies of Iran and Islam, No. 22, 65-78. (in Persian(
Sohangir & Salami (1393), “Patterns of space creation in architecture based on postmodern theoretical paradigms”, Baghe Nazar, Vol. 5, No. 14, 1-31. (in Persian(
Tabarsi, Fazl ibn Hasan (1380), Aladab aldiyniat lilkhizanat almueinia, Translated by Ahmad Abedi, Qom, Zaer. (in Persian(
Varavini, Sa'ad ad-Din (1366),  Marzban'name, By effort of Khalil Khatib Rahbar, Tehran, Safi. (in Persian(
Vakili & Nodehi (1390), “Etiquette of dinning table in ancient Iran and Iran during the Islamic period from the 2nd to the 7th century AH”, Quran and Hadith Sciences, Mishkat, No. 112, 119-137. (in Persian(
Weber, Max (1374), Economy & Society, Translated by Abbas Manoochehri & et al., Tehran, Mola. (in Persian(
Wilson, Elizabeth (1394), Fashion and Modernity, Translated by Naseraddin Gharab, Tehran, Elmi va Farhangi. (in Persian(
Yaghoobi Janbeh Saraei & Zahedi (1392), “The spatial implications of the story of the lion and the cow, explaining the power struggle and its distortion methods”, Literary Researches, vol. 10, No. 42, 143-166. (in Persian(
Yaghoobi janbeh saraei, Parsa (1396), “The position of the hidden author of the tales of Kalila and Demeneh: the construction of space distribution”, Literary criticism and theory, vol. 2, No.1, 53-84. (in Persian(
Yarmuhammadi, Lotfolah (1383), Popular and Critical Discourse Analysis, Tehran, Hermes. (in Persian(
Yazdkhasti et al. (1387), “The concept of the body in Merleau-Ponty's philosophical thought and theoretical challenges in its sociological reading”, Cognition, No.126, 129-140. (in Persian(
Zabihniya Omran & Sangaki (1391), “Teaching the model of government in Kalileh ve Demneh and Golestan Saadi”, Didactic Literature, No. 13, 197-236. (in Persian(
Zahedi, Chonur (1393), “Explaining the political and social thoughts of Kalileh and Demneh based on spatial implications(Spatial indicators)”, Master thesis, University of Kurdistan. (in Persian(
Zarghami & Behrooz (1394), “The role and concept of space in recreating the theory of architecture and science”, Interdisciplinary studies in human sciences, vol. 7, No. 2, 81-99. (in Persian(

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 09 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 10 October 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics