Journal of Literary Criticism  and  Rhetoric

Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric

Conceptual and Structural Deficiencies in Literary Criticism of Afghanistan

Document Type : scientific-research

Authors
1 Ph.D. Graduated of Persian Language and Literature Department, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
2 Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
3 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract
Literary criticism in Afghanistan two last decades, concurrent with the expansion of literary and cultural activities, has witnessed a remarkable growth and proliferation of sources, academic theses and journalistic criticism; nevertheless, this quantitative expansion has failed to lead to the formation of a coherent, sustained and methodologically grounded critical discourse and has instead resulted largely in the accumulation of fragmented texts. The present article aims to identify and systematically analyze the conceptual and structural deficiencies of literary criticism in Afghanistan by examining the most significant domains in which theoretical weakness, methodological inadequacy and linguistic divergence are clearly manifested and traceable. The research adopts a descriptive–analytical method with a diagnostic approach grounded in conceptual and structural analysis of critical texts (Criticism of poetry and story/novel). The findings indicate that the crisis of literary criticism in Afghanistan stems primarily from the misinterpretation of literary theories, their superficial or merely formulaic application, the absence of a clear analytical language and the predominance of subjective judgment in place of structured and reasoned analysis. Moreover, structural examination reveals that deficiencies in systematic theoretical education, the prevalence of incomplete or inaccurate translations, the absence of effective mechanisms for scholarly evaluation and the dominance of taste-oriented approaches within the literary sphere have created conditions for instability, fragmentation, and methodological discontinuity, while further intensifying the persistence of this situation. These deficiencies operate in an interconnected, network-like manner, placing literary criticism in a state of “epistemic deficiency” a condition in which theory is not properly assimilated, methodology fails to become established and criticism is prevented from fulfilling its role in the production of scholarly knowledge. Overcoming this vicious cycle requires a fundamental reconstruction of theoretical education, the strengthening of analytical methodology and the establishment of research institutions equipped with academic journals and systematic systems of university-level evaluation. Such reforms are essential for disciplinary coherence alone.
Keywords

 
Arian, Nasir Ahmad. (2018). Misreading. Kabul: Ariana. (In Persian)
Arian, Nasir. (2019). “Narrative of Tastes: An Analysis of the Poem Masoomiyat-e Sangha by Mojib Mehrdad Based on Close Reading Techniques.” Contemporary Literature Quarterly, Issues 14–15, pp. 92–98. (In Persian)
Barthes, Roland. (2012). Criticism and Truth, trans. Shirin Daqiqian. Tehran: Markaz. (In Persian)
Bressler, Charles. (2021). Introduction to Literary Theories and Methods, trans. Mostafa Abedini-Fard. Tehran: Nilofar. (In Persian)
Coller, Jonathan. (2017). Literary Theory: A Very Brief Introduction, trans. Farzaneh Taheri. Tehran: Markaz. (In Persian)
Eagleton, Terry. (2009). Introduction to Literary Theory, trans. Abbas Mokhber. Tehran: Markaz. (In Persian)
Gholamhossinzadeh, Gholamhossin; Hosseinali Ghobadi; Naser Nikbakht & Mohammad Amin Zavari. (2012). “A Sociological Critique of the Novel Hazarkhaneh-ye Khaab va Ekhtenaq.” Textual Literary Studies Quarterly, Issue 52, pp. 7–36. (In Persian)
Jafari, Mahmoud. (2019). “Smoke and Shadows: A Psychoanalytic Reading of Shadow in the Darkness by Najiba Ayubi.” Contemporary Literature Quarterly, Issues 16–17, pp. 146–149. (In Persian)
Jung, Carl Gustav. (1968). The Spirit in Man, Art and Literature. Princeton University Press.
Kazemi, Mohammad Kazem. (1997). “A Look at Khakestar-e Seda, Poems by Seyed Fazlullah Qodsi.” Golbang Journal, Supplement of Vahdat Weekly, Vol. 1, Issue 22. (In Persian)
Kazemi, Mohammad Kazem. (2010, Sept. 28). “A Look at the Love Poems of Qahar Asi.” Payam Aftab website. (In Persian)
Kazemi, Mohammad Kazem. (2013). “Corners of the Ghazal Revolution: A Critique of In My Dreams, the Child is Sad by Ruh al-Amin Amini.” Sh'er Quarterly, Issue 70. (In Persian)
Khaliq, Saleh Mohammad. (2014). Mirror in Mirror: Criticism, Theory and Research. Balkh: Writers’ Association of Balkh. (In Persian)
Khoshzamir, Razieh; Alireza nikouei & Reza Cheraghi. (2023).  “Taste-based Criticism: Its Concept and Evolution in Literary Criticism and Theory in Iran.” Research Journal of Literary Schools, Vol. 7, Issue 24, pp. 85-113. (In Persian)
Kohestani, Tamana; Mahin Panahi & Majid Houshangi. (2025). “Analysis of The Fifth Dervish by Rahnavard Zaryab Based on the Axial Archetype of Return and Its Implicit Archetypal System.” Subcontinent Studies, Vol. 17, Issue 49, pp. 231–250. (In Persian)
Mujir, Abdul Wahab. (2010). In the Labyrinth of Today’s Ghazal of Balkh. Balkh: Free Writers’ Association of Balkh. (In Persian)
Moeini, Soolmaz; Ahmad Razi and Reza Cheraghi. (2021). “The Necessities and Requirements of Ecocriticism with a Look at Its Shortcomings in Iranian Scholarly Articles” Literary Criticism Quarterly, Year 14, No. 54, pp. 145–188. (In Persian)
Makarik, Irna Rima. (2004). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theories, trans. Mehran Mohajer & Mohammad Nabavi. Tehran: Agah. (In Persian)
Nawali, Mahmoud. (2024). “Characteristics of Dasein in Heidegger’s Being and Time.” Philosophical Studies Journal of Tabriz University, Vol. 18, Issue 49, pp. 43–60. (In Persian)
Nikouei, Alireza. (2019). “A Critical Review of Books on Literary Criticism Regarding Its Sources.” Contemporary Persian Literature, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 249–271. (In Persian)
Noornia, Noor Mohammad; Ahmad Razi & Alireza Nikouei. (2025). “Theoretical Sources of Afghan Literary Criticism.” Journal of New Literary Essays, Vol. 58, Issue 1, pp. 45–71. (In Persian)
Partaw Naderi, Nasrullah. (2021). Pioneers of Modern Poetry in Afghanistan. Kabul: Zaryab. (In Persian)
Partaw Naderi, Nasrullah. (2022). Pir-e Roshani-Frosh. Kabul: Vajeh va Farhang. (In Persian)
Payandeh, Hossein. (2022). Literary Theory and Criticism: An Interdisciplinary Textbook. Tehran: Morvarid. (In Persian)
Qawim, Abdul Qayyum. (2011). Collected Essays on Literary Theory and Criticism. Kabul: Saeed. (In Persian)
Rastgar, Ali Shir. (2017). “Discourse Analysis of Distinguishing Elements between Classical and Modern Persian Poetry.” Contemporary Literature Quarterly, Issue 7, pp. 48–53. (In Persian)
Rateb, Emran. (2019). Melancholy and Doubt: Essays on Meaning and Textual Interpretation. Kabul: Nasl-e Naw. (In Persian)
Sarab, Ismail. (2018). Poetic Exploitation. Kabul: Amiri. (In Persian)
Seyed Haidari, Batool. (2019). “Confusion and Alienation: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Characters Created in Afghan Women’s Stories.” Contemporary Literature Quarterly, Issues 16–17, pp. 105–108. (In Persian)
Shamisa, Cyrus. (2004). Literary Criticism. Tehran: Ferdowsi. (In Persian)
Taslimi, Ali. (2019). Literary Criticism: Literary Theories and Their Applications in Persian Literature. Tehran: Akhtaran. (In Persian)
Wahidyar, Afsanah. (2021). A Journey into Otherness: An Analysis of Herat Poetry from 2001 to 2021. Herat: An. (In Persian)
Yasna, Yaqub. (2014). Reading the Text: Possible Writings for Literary Discourse. Kabul: Maqsudi. (In Persian)
Yasna, Yaqub. (2020). Disenchanting Enlightenment. Kabul: Maqsudi. (In Persian)

  • Receive Date 06 January 2026
  • Revise Date 29 May 2026
  • Accept Date 30 May 2026