Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران.

10.22059/jlcr.2024.383931.2026

چکیده

از برکات رواج و روایی زبان و ادبیات پارسی در شبه قارّۀ هندوستان، نوشته شدن کتاب­‌های بسیاری به زبان پارسی در موضوعات گوناگون، توسّط اندیشمندان و نخبگان آن دیار بوده­ است. چنانکه برخی استادان و ادیبان شبه قارّه، کتاب­‌ها و رساله‌­هایی پر ارج و ارز به پارسی در بلاغت، شعرشناسی و نقد ادبی از خود به یادگار نهاده‌­اند. جامع الصّنایع و الاوزان (778-770ﻫ.ق)، یکی از همین آثار است که توسّط سیف جام هروی و برای شاهزاده «فتح خان»، فرزند «فیروزشاه» از سلسلۀ تغلق شاهیان نوشته شده­ است. جامع الصّنایع، به مثابۀ کتابی در بلاغت و محاسن و معایب شعر دَری، با وجود تأثیرگیری از برخی آثار بلاغی پارسی و عربی نظیر حدایق السّحر، حقایق الحدایق، مفتاح العلوم و تلخیص المفتاح، نوگویی­‌های قابل توجّهی دارد که در جای خود بررسیده تواند شد. افزون بر این، کتاب دربردارندۀ اطّلاعات و نکاتِ ارزشمندی در شعرشناسی و نقد ادبی است و خبر از آن می­‌دهد که نویسندۀ آن، همچنانکه نظم را بر نثر رجحان می‌­دهد، شاعری را امری موهبتی می­‌داند. او میان «شاعر» با «موزون‌طبع» و «خوب­طبع» تفاوت می­گذارد. طرفدار معنادار بودن شعر است، امّا جانب زیبایی و بِاندامی شعر را نیز فرو نمی­‌گذارد. در پیروی شاعران هم­‌روزگار خود از استادان پیشین، نظراتی دارد که شایستۀ بازخوانی و بررسی است. تن دادن به «جواز» را در شعر خوش نمی­‌دارد و شاخص­‌هایی برای نقد شعر دارد. همچنین جامع الصّنایع، کهنسال­‌ترین نوشتۀ بلاغی‌­ای است که در آن برای معرّفی «طرز» و طرزشناسی شعر پارسی کوشش شده ­است. در این راستا، پس از بیان معیارها، طرزهای شعر پارسی به نُه طرز تقسیم شده و هرکدام به شاعری که در آن طرز سرآمد بوده، انتساب یافته­ است. نهایت آنکه از نظرسیف هروی، طرز امیرخسرو دهلوی (725-651 ﻫ.ق)، چه در نثر و چه در شعر، سرآمد همۀ طرزها است. این نظر در کنار دیگر نظرات ستایش‌آمیز هروی دربارۀ امیرخسرو، از جایگاه والای این شاعر در شبه قارّه خبر می­‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Recognizing the Points of Aesthetics, Stylistics and Literary Criticism in Jame ol-Sanaye val-Awzan

نویسنده [English]

  • Mojahed Gholami

Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

چکیده [English]

One of the benefits of promoting Persian language and literature in the Indian subcontinent was that many books were written in Persian on various subjects by the intellectuals and elites of that land. Some of the masters and writers of the subcontinent have left behind valuable books and texts in Persian on rhetoric, understanding poetry, and literary criticism. Jame ol-Sanaye val-Awzan (770-778 AH) is one of these works. This book was written by Seyf Jam Heravi for Prince "Fath Khan", the son of "Firoz Shah" from the Tughlaq Shahi dynasty. Jame ol-Sanaye is a valuable book on rhetoric and the beauties and faults of Persian poetry. Although this book is influenced by some Persian and Arabic rhetorical works, such as Hadayegh ol-Sehr, Haghayegh ol-Hadayegh, Meftah al-Uloum, and Talkhis ol-Meftah, it contains significant innovations. These innovations will be mentioned in their place. In addition, the book contains valuable information and points about understanding poetry and literary criticism, and it is clear that its author considers poetry superior to prose and also considers the power of poetry to be innate. He distinguishes between a "poet" and a "composer"; he is in favor of the idea that poetry should have the meaning; But for him, the beauty and coherence of poetry are also important. He also has some noteworthy and testable opinions about the poets' following of the great poets of the past. He does not like the issue of “permissibility” in poetry. He also has indicators for criticizing poetry. Jame ol-Sanaye is the oldest rhetorical work in which an attempt has been made to define the “style” (Tarz) and stylistics of Persian poetry. In this regard, after stating some criteria, the styles of Persian poetry have been divided into nine styles, each of which has been attributed to a prominent poet. Finally, according to Seyf Heravi, the style of Amir Khusrow Dehlavi (651-725 AH), both in prose and in poetry, is superior to all styles. This opinion, along with his laudatory descriptions of Amir Khusrow, shows that this poet had a high position in the subcontinent.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rhetoric
  • stylistics
  • literary criticism
  • Tarz
  • Jame ol-Sanaye val-Awzan
  • Seyf Jam Heravi

 

Ahmadi, Babak (2005). Truth and Beauty: Lessons in the Philosophy of Art. 9th ed.    Tehran: Markaz. (In Persian)

Azad Belgerami, Mir Gholamali (2014). Tazkareh Sarv-e Azad. Mir Hashem Muhaddes (Emend.). Tehran: Safir Ardehal. (In Persian)

Bahar, Mohammad Taqi (Malek ol-shoara) (1974). Stylistics or the History of the Development of Persian Prose. 3rd ed. Tehran: Amir Kabir. (In Persian)

Dawlatshah Samarqandi (Amir Dawlatshah ibn Ala al-Dawlat Bokhtishah Ghazi) (1958). Tazkerat ol-shoara. Mohammad Abbasi (Emend). Tehran: ketabforoushi Barani. (In Persian)

Durant, Will (2006). The Pleasures of Philosophy. Abbas Zaryab Khoei (Trans). 18th ed. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. (In Persian)

Eagleton, Terry (2018). How to Read Poetry. Peyman Chehrazi (Trans.). 2nd ed. Tehran: Agah. (In Persian)

Fallah, Gholam-Ali (2015). "Pioneers of Persian Rhetoric in the Indian Subcontinent". Journal of Literary Studies and Research. Vol. 18. Spring and Summer. Pp. 133-141. (In Persian)

Fotouhi, Mahmoud (2012). Stylistics: Theories, Approaches and Methods. Tehran: Elmi. (In Persian)

Fotohi, Mahmoud (2006). Literary Criticism in the Indian Style. 2nd ed. Tehran: Sokhan. (In Persian)

Hawkes, Terence (2015). Structuralism and semiotics. Mojtaba Pordel (trans). Tehran: Taraneh. (In Persian)

Oufi, Muhammad (2009). Lobab ol-Alabab. Edward Brown and Saeed Nafisi (Emend). Tehran: Hermes. (In Persian)

Sarkhosh, Mohammad afzal (2010). Kalamat ol-shoara. Alireza Qazveh (Emend). Tehran: Library, Museum and Document Center of the Islamic Council. (In Persian)

Seyf Jam Heravi (2020). Jame ol-Sanaye val-Awzan. Zeinab Sadeghi Nejad (Emend). Tehran: Sokhan. (In Persian)

Seyyed Hosseini, Reza (2008). Literary Schools. 14th ed. Tehran: Negah. (In Persian)

Shahmoradi, Omid (2022). "Shir Ali Khan Lodi's Quotation from Jame ol-Sanaye val-Awzan by Seif Jam Heravi and Notes on the Editing of Mir'at Al-Khayal". Aineh Miras. V.20. No.70. Spring and Summer. Pp. 73-84. (In Persian)

Shamisa, Sirous (2002). Stylistics of Poetry. 8th ed. Tehran: Ferdows. (In Persian)

Shams Fakhri Isfahani (Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Fakhr al-Din Saeed Fakhri Isfahani) (2010). Meyar Jamali va Miftah Abu Ishaqi. Yahya Kardgar (Emend). Tehran: Library, Museum and Document Center of the Islamic Council. (In Persian)

Shams Qeys Razi (Shams al-Din Muhammad ibn Qeys Razi) (1981). Al-Mu'jam fi Ma'ayir ashaar Al-Ajam. Muhammad Qazvini and Modaress Razavi (Emend). Tehran: Zovar. (In Persian)

Shir Ali Khan Loudi (1998). Tazkreh Merat al-Khayal. Hamid Hassani with the collaboration of Behrouz Safarzadeh (Emend). Tehran:Rozaneh. (In Persian)

Tahanvi, Mohammad Ali ibn Ali (1996). Encyclopedia of the Exploration of Terms in techniques and Sciences. Beirut: Maktabat Lebanon nasheroun.

Newton, Eric (2002). The meaning of beauty. Parviz Marzban (trans). 5th ed. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. (In Persian)

Nezami Ganjavi, Elias-Ben-Yusuf (2000). Makhzan ol-Asrar. Hasan Vahid Dastgerdi (Emend). Tehran: Soureh Mehr. (In Persian)

Noshahi, Aref (2002). "Jami'e Sanae'e va al-Awzan: one of the ancient Persian sources in rhetorical sciences and stylistics Poetry". Ma'aref. V.19. No.1. Farvardin and Tir. Pp. 36-49. (In Persian)

Warburton, Nigel (2008). What is art? Mahtab Kalantari (trans). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)

Youshij, Nima (Ali Esfandiari Nouri) (1989). On poetry and compose poetry. Sirous Tahbaz (Ed.). Tehran: Daftarhaye Zamaneh. (In Persian)

Yousefian, Javad (2000). "A look at the concept of aesthetics". Tabriz Faculty of Literature and Humanities Publication. V. 43. No. 177. Pp. 135-172. (In Persian)

Zarrin Koub, Abdolhossein (1984). Untruthful Poetry, Unmasked Poetry. 4th ed. Tehran: Javidan Publishing Organization. (In Persian)